Catchy beat but scary message
Published Sunday, October 04, 2009 in
share this post

Let me start by saying I realize I am not among the Gap’s target market. The styles and construction of the apparel sold there are simply not meant for a woman who birthed four children, starting 20 years ago. But I ended up there recently while on a hunt for long sleeved t-shirts. (They had t-shirts, but I didn’t buy any. Re-read sentence #2).
Back to the point of this post… so I’m shopping at the Gap and there’s this song on the sound system. I assume the song is called “What’s so bad about feeling good?” as that’s the line that was repeated most often, in between verses about dancing and “letting your love mingle with mine.”
I had to give this band credit because the lyric was at least marginally euphemistic, a relief from most songs that include now-familiar graphic descriptions of every sort of lewd act.
But then this song did something scary – something I have not heard in even the most offensive rap or hip-hop tunes. At the bridge, the singer chanted, and a chorus repeated, “No guilt. All pleasure.” in a rousing tribute to hedonism that built to a fevered crescendo for several measures.
I googled those few lyrics and found the song, by Ben Lee. (I was right about the title. How creative.) Here’s the part that bothered me:
No guilt. All Pleasure. C'mon I wanna hear you yell it now
No guilt. All Pleasure. C'mon everybody yell it now
No guilt. All Pleasure. I wanna hear you yell it baby
No guilt. All Pleasure. C'mon everybody...Tell me what's so bad, about feeling good
The message is literally drummed into your ears in mindless repetition.
But hey, the song has a good beat and a catchy tune. So what's the big deal, right?
I’ve written a columns lately about the issue of lyrics in today’s popular music. I’m concerned that our kids are being indoctrinated into attitudes about sex that are dangerously cavalier (and sometimes even violent) thanks to the vulgar and hedonistic messages in the songs to which they mindlessly sing along.
In defense of today’s music, I often hear that it’s no more shocking to us than were Elvis or the Doors or the Beatles to our parents. But it’s not the same as when we were growing up, because in order to “push the envelope,” every generation has grown increasingly bolder in graphic sexual content.
Back in the day, love songs merely implied making love. But love songs are different from songs about having sex, and that’s my concern about the music of our children’s generation. They don’t hear love songs. They hear songs glorifying soulless, mindless, meaningless sex.
“No guilt. All pleasure” is a deeply disturbing anthem. It’s the soundtrack to the hookup culture that is devastating the hearts and souls of our college students, trampling the innocence of our high schoolers, and creating in our young children a selfishness that will rob them of happiness in the years to come.
When it comes to our kid’s music, we need to sustain our ability to be shocked. We can’t just throw up our hands, claim ignorance of the words to the songs, and play the role of the tuned out older generation. If we’re worried at all about the direction our culture is headed, we have to become more engaged, more aware and more outraged.
As I said at the outset, I’m not in the demographic that the Gap is trying to lure into the store. Considering the messages that are piped into the minds of their shoppers, I wish my kids weren’t in that demographic either.
QUESTION:
I would shop faithfully at any store that deliberately played inoffensive background music. Doesn’t it seem that a chain of stores that made a commitment to upholding a more wholesome environment would be successful? What do you think?
| Comments |
By
Katherine @
Monday, October 05, 2009 4:10 AM
|
We are raising 3 boys and I would be the first one in line at a store that didn't play offensive music - as long as the clothing didn't have a skull and crossbones printed on the front. We were at a Culver's restaurant a few nights ago - fast food hamburgers - and the music they were playing didn't have the best lyrics - not to mention it was really loud - so we asked the manager to turn it down, and he did! We thanked him before we left. Maybe next time they will have a different channel playing.
|
|
|
By
Yiwei @
Wednesday, October 07, 2009 4:35 PM
|
|
It is getting tough to buy clothes for my 7-yr-old daughter. Everywhere I turn I see miniskirts, Hanna Montana, princess, sparkly and lacy shirts. Where have all the innocent clothes go? The places I find are LandsEnd, LLBean. They have consistenly good quality clothes with reasonable prices. I certianly don't find their clothes offensive.
|
|
|
By
Abbie @
Friday, November 13, 2009 10:05 PM
|
|
Oh dear--those lyrics are troubling indeed. I haven't heard that song.
|
|
|
By
Joey @
Friday, December 04, 2009 6:58 PM
|
|
You must be kidding, it's ok to bomb, dismember, water-board and defend ultra-right freak talk shows. But, sex, no...that is a definite no no. Oh, I get it...bombs make us money, sex can only get us parents into complicated and expensive messes. Please some balance to your blogging.
|
|
|
By
Kate @
Wednesday, December 09, 2009 5:26 PM
|
Joey, recall Abraham Lincoln's advice: "It is better to remain silent and allow the world to think you foolish than to open your mouth and remove all doubt." Your dubious response required serious revisionary attention before posting.
First off, telling someone to put balance into the opinions he or she expresses in a personal blog contradicts the point of having a blog at all. How asinine of you.
Second, as one of Marybeth's faithful readers, I can tell you she has never advocated for bombing, waterboarding, or dismembering anything. If you read her column/blog regularly, you will notice that she writes on the dangers of our overly-violent media. Where have you seen Marybeth say anything in support of all that violence you mention? Such an argument lacks a premise, and indeed has no bearing in your criticism of her blog.
Third, the blog never says anything opposing sex; Marybeth opposes the hypersexualization found in the media, and rightly so. As a college student, I personally abstain from the horribly cavalier hook-up culture. I've watched many of my friends make decisions they later regret, because -- as they've told me -- in real life, you can't have casual sex without feeling guilty, used, or at the very least awkward when that guy from Saturday night walks into the room. Frankly, I think Marybeth ranks the monetary expenses associated with teen pregnancy lower than the moral degeneration our society's attitude toward sex engenders in rising generations.
Finally, I must note that aside from your baseless and unresearched content, you really should address your grammar. You opened your post with this gem: You must be kidding, it's ok to bomb, dismember, water-board and defend ultra-right freak talk shows. Just so we're clear, the way you phrased that would mean you're accusing Marybeth of supporting the bombing, dismembering, and waterboarding of said talk show hosts. Consider investing in Hooked on Phonics or some other program which can aid you in your confusion over subjects and predicates.
|
|
|
By
Rachelle @
Friday, February 19, 2010 5:05 PM
|
I am so glad you have a blog like this! I support what you are doing. I have 6 children and it is a scarey place. I am a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. We have a little booklet called "The Strength of Youth". It is a bookelt for the youth of guidlines and principles to live by to stay clean morally and physically, etc. in this world we live in. It talks about friends, dating, music, family, education, and much more here is a link if you are interested in checking it out. https://beta.lds.org/youth?locale=eng
https://beta.lds.org/youth/for-the-strength-of-youth/standards?locale=eng
Check it out if you want to. It supports the theme of this blog. Thank you for having a blog like this again!
|
|
|
Click here to post a comment
|
|